tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22777475.post252558055233405976..comments2024-03-28T08:42:27.454+00:00Comments on thequacksoflife: And your opinionsThe Quacks of Lifehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05165918541194607143noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22777475.post-78660347333550670592009-01-31T06:05:00.000+00:002009-01-31T06:05:00.000+00:00st - the cloud puzzles me. since i took them at th...st - the cloud puzzles me. since i took them at the same time. fluke i guess!!<BR/><BR/>mary (forest) - ta<BR/><BR/>mary (view) - intesting, i'll post my thoughts tomorrow afteroon.The Quacks of Lifehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05165918541194607143noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22777475.post-39755275268270432542009-01-31T01:47:00.000+00:002009-01-31T01:47:00.000+00:00Pete, I enlarged the photos for a comparison from ...Pete, I enlarged the photos for a comparison from A to B. I think the photos in Batch B are crisper. (But it's Friday night and my eyes are tired).Maryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02040099513110890878noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22777475.post-52559282938048855162009-01-30T22:45:00.000+00:002009-01-30T22:45:00.000+00:00Pete- On the whole i agree, with Tricia's comments...Pete- On the whole i agree, with Tricia's comments.<BR/>The exception being the wanted shot in batch b. that's just superb.<BR/>The same trial, with a very colourful subject Mid distance, would prove interesting. <BR/><BR/>Was there much time difference between the pictures? I'm thinking, better light may have an effect on colour saturation.<BR/><BR/>I.e. there is a lot less cloud (generally) in batch bSThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11399555929730922985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22777475.post-62069488203292405412009-01-30T20:44:00.000+00:002009-01-30T20:44:00.000+00:00Overall I think I prefer batch B I like the colour...Overall I think I prefer batch B I like the colours better (maybe they just suit my monitor better) I like the slightly bluer sky it seems to give the clouds better definition.I agree that the nearer objects seem better defined in batch bMaryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13578767487517032389noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22777475.post-78163338405347865742009-01-30T19:31:00.000+00:002009-01-30T19:31:00.000+00:00anony - name? the last one he refused to pose!! no...anony - name? the last one he refused to pose!! no flash either which I thought was impressive. anyway batch a or batch b??<BR/><BR/>trish - the colour differences was amazing. if i was scientific i'd have changed the zoom for the portico shotThe Quacks of Lifehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05165918541194607143noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22777475.post-62546977806001517952009-01-30T18:59:00.000+00:002009-01-30T18:59:00.000+00:00Now this is interesting. There are differences be...Now this is interesting. There are differences between the two batches.<BR/><BR/>Colour - this is more saturated in batch B - and it's a matter of taste as to whether it's an improvement or not.<BR/><BR/>Sharpness - in Batch A the definition of the distance objects is better than that in Batch B. But the reverse is also true i.e. In Batch B the definition is better than Batch A in the objects closer to the camera.<BR/><BR/>The external columns of the entrance to the building: in Batch A the there is no narrowing off (towards the top) whereas this is very pronounced in Batch B. In this instance I very much prefer the Batch A picture.Tricia Ryderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05010432313312804286noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22777475.post-35883811456915893152009-01-30T18:37:00.000+00:002009-01-30T18:37:00.000+00:00you have to know that the last one is stinky. The...you have to know that the last one is stinky. The 2 columned porticos good.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com